The SUNY Librarians Association Conference was last week, but only now do I have a chance to write about what I got out of the conference.
Like most SUNYLA conferences, there was a lot of useful stuff and just a few sessions that didn’t really add to my knowledge or provide me with any ideas.
I gave a presentation with two of my colleagues about strategies to reach out to faculty (slides and speaker notes are here) and the conversations afterward (in the session and on the way to lunch) provided a real glimpse at what SUNY libraries are doing, and other possible strategies that we could use. For example, several libraries provide new faculty with a pot of money to buy books from the library. The library liaison is responsible for helping the new faculty member spend their money, which provides a great opportunity for the faculty members and the liaison to get to know one another. Other libraries made it a point of taking new faculty out for coffee, in order to share with them some information about the library, and to determine what their needs might be. Another library actually provided a competitive grant for established faculty to get a small pot of money to purchase books to support new research directions.
Another excellent presentation was given by Suzanne Bell from the University of Rochester about her institution’s home grown institutional repository, called IR+ (open source, code available here). One of the things that makes this repository unique is the not visible to the public workspace provided to each faculty member. This repository doesn’t just serve as a final resting place for documents, but it provides researchers with sharing and version control services, allowing them to collaborate with other researchers (at U of R and other places) more easily. I really like how this tool attempts to get into the researchers workflow much earlier in the process, rather than just accepting the final output, like most IRs.
This presentation sparked an excellent conversation with some of my colleagues at Geneseo about the possibilities for us to support faculty research, including some of the practical steps we need to take in order to do this.
The last session I attended was a presentation from two librarians about how to do a systemmatic review, a type of review article (kind of) that I was not very familiar with. They gave a clear explanation of the process. I wish there had been more time for questions but it was interesting.
Once again, a satisfying conference. I look forward to next year.