For as long as there have been reference desks in libraries, there has been a debate and a discussion about the nature of the reference transaction. In some cases, the reference transaction is simply a question and answer exchange. The patron asks the question, the librarian finds the answer and passes it along:
Q: Who was the 32nd president of the united states?
A: Franklin D. Roosevelt
But in many cases, the reference transaction is about much more than simply providing answers, it’s about teaching the patron how to find the answer themselves.
Q: Who was the 32nd president of the united states?
A: Well, a quick google search leads us to the Wikipedia list of presidents. Here it lists Franklin D. Roosevelt as the 32nd president, and provides some citations for that information. If you are just curious, the Wikipedia list will be perfect, but if you need to cite this in a paper, you might want to refer to the White House website, which would be more authoritative and provides some good biographical information. Do you need to find more information about Roosevelt? if so, we may have some biographies of him in our collection….
Just like any other learning opportunity, a big part of the whole experience is retention – do the students/patrons remember what you taught them an hour from now, a week from now or a month from now.
With that in mind, librarians at my library will be working on some new practices for the Spring semester. Building on the tendency of librarians to jot down search terms or possible databases while working with a patron, we will be making a more concerted effort to write down notes as we answer a question and give those notes to the student when we are done. The idea here is that students will better be able to retain the knowledge they gained if they can refer back to the notes that were taken.
We’d like to try and capture information on this student learning, so we are going to try two things. First, we will be using standardized carbonless duplicate note-taking forms. This way the student gets a copy of the notes, and we can retain a copy for future study. Second, we hope to combine this with an assessment of student learning at the reference desk (or at least an assessment of what students think they learned at the reference desk) by asking students to fill out a brief survey asking them what they learned.
Hopefully we can be more deliberate in making sure students walk away with a record of the transaction and this will increase the learning that goes on during a reference transaction.
I’ll let you know how it works out.
the Undergraduate Science Librarian 